Skip to main content

Moral Business Practices = Success


This business owner GETS IT!

Jonathan Wallace, a New York attorney and activist that once led a highly successful tech business, has been a writer and lecturer for a number of years on topics related to government, ethics, law, economic and social issues. In 1996, he launched Ethical Spectacle, a website where he shares his views on the world. That's where I stumbled upon his online article, "Compassionate Capitalism," the day that I started this blog. The thing that struck me most about his article is the following axiom.


Two other successful businessmen who get it are Marc Benioff (Salesforce.com) and Alan Hassenfeld (Hasbro, Inc.). The former authored a book, Compassionate Capitalism: How Corporations Can Make Doing Good an Integral Part of Doing Well, in 2004, and the latter wrote the foreword. Hassenfeld, who was CEO of Hasbro, Inc., before becoming Chairman of the Board, implores his capitalist colleagues to become more socially responsible by connecting to their communities, from executive to employee and to the towns where they live. In the foreword to Benioff's book, he writes, "community service cannot be performed well in a silo. It should not be shunted off into a single department or relegated to a single manager. It should be a living, breathing part of every company's culture and mission, alongside profitability, innovation, and good business practices." He goes onto conclude that this practice will help, not hinder the ideals of capitalism.


"This will not come at the expense of business goals, but it will augment them."

Again, we see in this book and the foreword, written by highly successful businessmen and capitalists, the truth plainly stated that moral business practices, like doing good in the community, equals real success.

This same sentiment is being echoed in the hallowed halls of government. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, during a CNN Town Hall in February 2016, told a millennial that the solution to the problems caused by capitalism are not progressive policies, but trying to make wealthy people more compassionate. (See the 10 May 2017 MSNBC article by Michael J. Sainato).

In a January 2016 Op-Ed by New York Times columnist Nicolas Kristof, he writes, "Back in 2000, George W. Bush did something fascinating: On the campaign trail he preached 'compassionate conservatism,' telling wealthy Republicans about the travails of Mexican-American immigrants and declaring to women in pearls that 'the hardest job in America' is that of a single mother." Kristof claimed that a resurgence in this idea, promoted by Bush in 2000, was evident on the latest campaign trail (in 2016).

Former CEO of Amway turned author, Rich Devos, outlines his 16-part "Credo for Compassionate Capitalism'' that draws heavily on the Judeo-Christian ethical tradition, then melds its precepts with those of capitalism, in his book Compassionate Capitalism: People Helping People Help Themselves, a bestseller published back in 1994. (Interesting side note: His daughter, Betsy, is currently serving as the Trump Administration's Secretary of Education).

Jonathan Wallace also promotes the Judeo-Christian ideal of the servant leader (Shout out to my conservative Christian friends!). Another great oracle he and I both admire, Gandhi, said, "We must be the change we wish to see in the world." To blend these ideals and rephrase them, let me assert that we must humble ourselves and be leaders that others want to follow to enact radical change. To me, it's not just "lead by example," it is CHANGE by example!

For many, it's not just a religious ethos, but one for all humanity, regardless of religious persuasion--athiest, mono- and polytheist alike!

We can't continue to support unbridled capitalism as it has existed in America since the beginning. We need to embrace COMPASSIONATE CAPITALISM and leverage the power of the wealthy to bring about much needed change.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's in a name?

WHY wrongcapitalism.blogspot.com? Truth be told, "compassionate capitalism" was already in use. And we've been practicing "wrong capitalism" since the foundation of this republic, I'm afraid. As I stated in my very first blog post, WHY? , I want this blog to stand for something. It's stated purpose is to take the "I" out of capitalism. Yes, there are two I's, but my point being that self-centered capitalism has another name: GREED. You'll notice the color of the header on this post is green. We've been singularly focused on the Almighty Dollar for far too long. And where has it gotten us? We are the richest nation in the world and poverty still affects millions of us. According to UCDavis, and I just Googled this today, "The official poverty rate is 13.5 percent, based on the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 estimates. That year, an estimated 43.1 million Americans lived in poverty." Can you wrap your head around th...

"JUST SAY NO!" to Reaganomics

I think TIME has proven this to be a failed economic policy. As you'll read in this article , even President G.H.W. Bush, saw it as a sham, calling it "VooDoo Economics." And as the first Pres. Bush would also say, "JUST SAY NO!" I stated in one of my first posts : We have CEOs who live in ivory towers. We have a conservative base who still believes some of that wealth is going to trickle down out of the ivory tower and magically make a difference at ground level. Has it made a difference in your life? In evaluating the effects of Reaganomics,  Paul Krugman points out in his January 2008 NY Times Op-ed , "But while the rich got much richer, there was little sustained economic improvement for most Americans. By the late 1980s, middle-class incomes were barely higher than they had been a decade before — and the poverty rate had actually risen." We NEED our middle class. And while I don't think the rich should be taxed at 91%, it shouldn...